This open access book contextualizes China’s 70 years of contemporary history against one coherent backdrop: a late developing country endeavoring at all costs to industrialize, whether it was in the name of socialism or capitalism. This path is even more complicated by China’s getting caught in the geo-political confrontation of two superpowers in the 20th century: the Soviet ...
This open access book contextualizes China’s 70 years of contemporary history against one coherent backdrop: a late developing country endeavoring at all costs to industrialize, whether it was in the name of socialism or capitalism. This path is even more complicated by China’s getting caught in the geo-political confrontation of two superpowers in the 20th century: the Soviet Union and the USA. The author argues that China could only cope with these costs by internalizing them. As one of the leading scholars of agrarian issues in China, the author emphasizes the role of rural sector having been a source of surplus extraction for industrialization and the receptor of cost of development being transferred by the urban sector.
This book is the first volume of the Global University for Sustainability Book Series published with Palgrave Macmillan.
WEN Tiejun is Professor and Director of the Centre of Rural Reconstruction, Renmin University of China, Beijing; Executive Dean, the Institute of Rural Reconstruction of China, Southwest University, Chongqing; Executive Dean of the Institute of Rural Reconstruction of the Straits, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China. He is a Founding Member of the Global ...
WEN Tiejun is Professor and Director of the Centre of Rural Reconstruction, Renmin University of China, Beijing; Executive Dean, the Institute of Rural Reconstruction of China, Southwest University, Chongqing; Executive Dean of the Institute of Rural Reconstruction of the Straits, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China. He is a Founding Member of the Global University for Sustainability.
The author has tried to explain what happened at different times based on reality rather than any particular ideologies or developmental models. Therefore, I would highly recommend it to people doing ...The author has tried to explain what happened at different times based on reality rather than any particular ideologies or developmental models. Therefore, I would highly recommend it to people doing comparative studies between China and other countries (especially Western countries) or who are interested in the economic history of China. (展开)
3 有用 弃子🔥 2024-01-31 23:59:27 河南
《十次危机》,刷的油罐视频讲课版,新天朝七十年经济史,有别于主流的宏大叙事,“逢八必危,遇九而衰”,看下来最大的感受,就是整个经济就是一个“巨大的草台班子”,到谁手里都是一个烂摊子,总是被危机搞得左支右绌,焦头烂额,而后急急忙忙出台应对措施,结果又埋下下次危机的种子,根本没人看清楚究竟改变了什么,特别是后毛时代。 最可恶的是那些本来应对危机的一时之策,瞬间就攒起一个利益集团,胁迫临时政策成为政治正... 《十次危机》,刷的油罐视频讲课版,新天朝七十年经济史,有别于主流的宏大叙事,“逢八必危,遇九而衰”,看下来最大的感受,就是整个经济就是一个“巨大的草台班子”,到谁手里都是一个烂摊子,总是被危机搞得左支右绌,焦头烂额,而后急急忙忙出台应对措施,结果又埋下下次危机的种子,根本没人看清楚究竟改变了什么,特别是后毛时代。 最可恶的是那些本来应对危机的一时之策,瞬间就攒起一个利益集团,胁迫临时政策成为政治正确,甚至法律,以便他们更多的占有利益,更多地将成本转嫁给底层。天朝经济就是如此稀里糊涂,磕磕绊绊地艰难向前,总是一个将垮未垮,将爆未爆的临界状态,仿佛“击鼓传炸弹💣”,鼓声越来越密,只等那最后一下。 p.s.而一个怡情又让它苟延残喘到现在 (展开)
4 有用 一颗牛油果🥑 2022-05-03 22:56:16
The author has tried to explain what happened at different times based on reality rather than any particular ideologies or developmental models. Therefore, I would highly recommend it to people doing ... The author has tried to explain what happened at different times based on reality rather than any particular ideologies or developmental models. Therefore, I would highly recommend it to people doing comparative studies between China and other countries (especially Western countries) or who are interested in the economic history of China. (展开)
2 有用 东林遗孤 2022-08-10 15:53:28
为了写IPE相关论文看。着重看了2013年以后的部分,也就是原版八次危机没有的。可能是因为数据难收集,不太能服众,骂美国也骂得太多,不如前面的八次危机
0 有用 风后 2023-02-27 23:11:30 浙江
前面的不说了。第十次危机,分析的都是什么乱七八糟的。
0 有用 咕咚咚咚咚 2024-12-21 13:57:24 云南
大事年表和《八次危机》不同,值得注意😋